明天我依然爱你

“菜篮子”价格呈现季节性下降姜蒜供应偏紧涨势明显_我的网站

穆赫兰道

一 |

Shipping containers are loaded and unloaded onto ships at the Port of Los Angeles, California, on July 9, 2025. US President Donald Trump has sent letters to multiple countries dictating new US tariff rates on their countries' imports to the USA. Photo: VCG

Shipping containers are loaded and unloaded onto ships at the Port of Los Angeles, California, on July 9, 2025. Photo: VCG
When even major US allies and trading partners are swept into Washington's alleged China-linked transshipment network, is the US still cracking down on its so-called illegal tariff evasion, or is it raising its "small yard, high fence" higher and tighten it further by wielding its tariff stick and extending tariff controls across normal global supply chains?
The White House on Thursday released a report identifying roughly 40 economies as participants in what it calls a "Shadow Transshipment Network", alleging that Chinese goods are being routed through third countries to evade higher US tariffs. The list stretches across Asia, Europe and the Americas and includes some of Washington's closest allies and largest trading partners.
Chinese experts said the report is partly aimed at defending Washington's tariff policy by shifting responsibility for its weakened impact onto other economies, while also pressuring them to follow US trade and origin rules. In effect, the US is trying to extend its unilateral trade restrictions beyond its own borders and deeper into global supply chains, they said.
Build 'higher fence'
The 25-page report claims that US import sourcing saw a "substantial reallocation" after the 2018 tariffs, as China's direct share declined and imports from identified transshipment economies rose. It alleges that some goods were routed through lower-tariff jurisdictions, where minor processing, relabeling, repackaging, re-invoicing or paperwork changes were used to create the appearance of a new national origin.
However, the report itself acknowledges that alleged transshipment risks in several major economies are "embedded within broad legitimate trade flows." It also admitted that the post-2018 shift in US imports "does not establish" that all displaced Chinese trade was illegally transshipped and partly reflected "legitimate changes in production, investment, and sourcing."
False declarations of origin or simple repackaging can amount to tariff circumvention, but investing overseas, building factories abroad or sourcing components across borders are legitimate forms of supply-chain adjustment, experts said.
One purpose of the report is to portray Washington's tariff policy as effective while attributing its diminished impact to the responses of other economies, Zhou Mi, a researcher at the Chinese Academy of International Trade and Economic Cooperation, told the Global Times.
This allows Washington to shift responsibility onto other economies and put itself in a more favorable position in shaping the narrative around its tariff policy, Zhou said.
Cui Fan, a professor at the University of International Business and Economics, told the Global Times that US rules for determining country of origin are not fully aligned with those used by other economies. The latest move could pressure other countries to adopt US standards, but Cui said such an approach is unlikely to work.
"Countries formulate their rules of origin based on a range of factors, including the scale and technological conditions of their own industries," Cui said. "Industrial structures and the global division of labor cannot be reshaped simply through pressure from one country."
Harmonization of rules of origin - applying the same rules across countries regardless of purpose - "would facilitate the flow of international trade," according to WTO on its website.
It has also warned that misuse of such rules may turn them into "a trade policy instrument" rather than merely a device supporting other trade policy measures, according to WTO.
Washington was pursuing hegemonic politics and unilateral bullying in the economic and trade sphere under the guise of "reciprocity", a spokesperson for China's Ministry of Commerce said when commenting on the US use of tariffs to pressure other countries into restricting economic and trade cooperation with China.
Disrupting global supply chains

Cui said production and trade networks linking China with South Korea, Europe and other economies have taken shape over years of market-driven specialization. By lowering production and logistics costs and improving efficiency, these networks have benefited businesses and consumers across participating economies.
"The real challenge facing global trade today is not so-called illegal transshipment, but the continued damage that unilateralism and trade protectionism are inflicting on the multilateral trading system," Cui added.
Since returning to office, the Trump administration has made tariffs a centerpiece of its trade policy, rolling out sweeping "reciprocal tariffs" and other broad duties that have drawn widespread criticism at home and abroad. On Thursday, Washington announced new Section 232 tariffs on drones and their parts and components, further expanding the range of products subject to US tariffs.
US tariffs have themselves pushed companies to reconfigure supply chains. Washington is now citing those very adjustments as evidence of circumvention, effectively using the market fallout from its own tariff policy to justify further trade restrictions, Chinese experts noted.
International trade is based on mutual benefit, and sovereign countries have the legitimate right to conduct economic and trade cooperation independently, Cui said. "No country should interfere with normal global trade simply to advance its own unilateral interests."
The report broadens its scrutiny beyond routing and documentation to include China-origin inputs or components, Chinese ownership or financing, relationships with Chinese suppliers or manufacturers, China-based production steps and China-origin routing histories.
Analysts believed the latest move is more than simply making the existing "high fence" higher. By trying to bring more economies and a larger portion of global supply chains within the reach of US tariff enforcement, Washington attempted to make the "yard" itself much bigger.
Cui warned that sustained US pressure to reshape normal trade and supply-chain links could fragment mature regional production networks, and reduce the efficiency of global resource allocation, with the impact extending far beyond China-US trade given the wide range of economies named in the report.
Zhou noted that companies would be forced to redesign supply chains to manage rising policy risks, adding costs that could feed back into the US through higher inflation while creating broader frictions and instability for global trade.
。

二 | 央视网消息：根据农业农村部最新监测，3月份以来，全国蔬菜价格呈现季节性下降走势，但是生姜和大蒜却出现了一轮明显上涨的走势。具体行情如何？先到北京的批发市场去了解一下。　　每天上午是北京新发地农产品批发市场的交易高峰期。但值得关注的是，姜蒜交易区和其他品类相比，人流量却不多。　　北京新发地市场商户介绍，现在一斤生姜的价格在6元左右，涨了40%，客户需求量不大。以前一天能卖一车货，现在是三天能卖两车货。　　北京采购商也表示，以前一天能拉四五十箱，现在能少一半，只有二三十箱。　　除了生姜的价格在四月份出现上涨，大蒜价格也在春节后经历了一波上涨行情。商户黄新全告诉记者，北京市场大蒜价格3月涨幅在一成以上，主要是河南等主要产区在2月下旬遭遇大范围低温雨雪天气，蒜苗受损、市场预期减产导致。

三 | 近期，随着产地大蒜长势恢复向好，价格出现小幅回落，但是比去年同期上涨幅度仍在五成以上。　　山东安丘：姜种用量增加产区供应阶段性偏紧　　农业农村部监测数据显示，自3月下旬开始至今，全国生姜价格已连续4周上涨。本轮生姜价格上涨原因有哪些？记者也赶赴生姜主产区进行了调查。　　在山东省安丘市西南庄村，生姜种植户正在田间忙着摆放姜种、施肥、盖土。据介绍，按目前产地生姜按每斤5.6元核算，每亩种植效益可以达到2万元左右。　　近一个月正是生姜播种农忙期，随着种植户扩种意愿加大，姜种用量也有所增加，部分生姜被作为姜种使用，使产区供应量减少。　　记者了解到，生姜产区由于阶段性供应偏紧，周边一些冷库储存商预期得到提高，纷纷抓紧收购生姜入库，这也导致生姜价格被不断推高。　　山东省安丘市生姜储存商孙建波介绍，生姜价格从2月份到现在一直是上涨态势，前几年种植量、收获量小了，库存量比前几年都少些。　　河南郑州：早熟蒜长势良好将于“五一”前后上市　　生姜正在播种，而新季大蒜即将迎来收获，目前河南等主产区生产情况怎样？未来全国大蒜价格的走势又将如何呢？　　河南郑州中牟县是大蒜主要产区，常年种植面积保持在20万亩以上。今年种植的早熟蒜有6万亩左右，即将在“五一”前后收获上市。